TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 评测

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 评测--采用磨砂显示屏的智能手机能否令人信服?再见,镜像 亮面屏幕实际上并不理想:在环境光下会形成反光,而且非常容易沾染指纹。我们来看看 TCL 50 Pro 智能手机,看看哑光显示屏是否真的有效,或者是否也有缺点。Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/05/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇭🇺 🇵🇱 🇷🇺 5G Android ARM Smartphone

判决TCL 的 NxtPaper 屏幕确实做得很好:可视角度良好,几乎没有反光,色彩鲜艳明亮。不过,最大亮度也只能满足需求,而且色彩保真度也不尽如人意。不过,该屏幕也可以在没有 PWM 的情况下运行,因此头痛患者可以松一口气了。

主摄像头也令人印象深刻,而广角摄像头只能记录模糊的细节。制造商本可以在性能方面做得更好一些,因为联发科 Dimensity 6300 在与同价位手机的对比中显得有些吃力。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

扬声器有点弱,但电池的续航时间还算不错,充电速度也还可以。

如果你能在性能和摄像头方面稍作妥协,TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 是光面屏幕手机的不错选择。

Pros+ 无 PWM 的哑光显示屏

+ 色彩还原度高

+ 运行时间长

+ 充电器包含在供货范围内

+ 主摄像头质量好

+ 支持 eSIMCons- 扬声器音质一般

- 性能一般

- 内存相对逊色

- 广角摄像头拍摄的图像模糊不清

价格和供应情况据制造商称,这款智能手机的售价为 299 欧元。

不过,在亚马逊网站上,测试时的价格已经便宜了 30 欧元。

$36.99SECRETIGER LCD Screen Display Touch Digitizer Assembly Replacement for TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper LCD Screen T803E T803D 6.8"$12.99TCL Phone Charger USB A to USB C Cable 5ft Charging Cord Compatible for TCL 60 XE Nxtpaper 5g/50 Pro/40/30/20/10 Gen 2/3/SE/XL, 605/505/503/408/NxtPaper 14/11 Plus, Stylus/Plex/Ion X/Classic, Flip 3/2$47.00JENCYFU TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Screen Replacement Full LCD Screen Display Touch Digitizer Frame Assembly with Repair Tool for Model TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper T803E T803D 6.8inch

Bestpreis 249.99 € galaxusTCL 50 Pro NXTPAPER 5G Moon Grey2. 257.13 € galaxus.at3. 275.77 € Electronic Shops4. 284.75008891293 € LaptopsDirect

可能的替代品比较

ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay

1.73.4%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘8 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1Amazon: 1. $36.99SECRETIGER LCD Screen Displa...2. $12.99TCL Phone Charger USB A to U...3. $47.00JENCYFU TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper ...List Price: 299€196 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.80"2460x1080395 PPIIPS

2.71.8%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 613 ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1Amazon: 1. $7.99beukei (3 Pack) Designed for...2. $36.00JENCYFU for HMD Fusion Scree...3. $38.99SECRETIGER LCD Screen Displa...List Price: 299€202.5 g256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.56"1612x720269 PPIIPS

3.75.8%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $11.99Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...2. $6.95Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...3. $6.99Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...List Price: 269€197 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080395 PPISuper AMOLED

4.74.7%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1Amazon: $485.00List Price: 349€171 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080405 PPIP-OLED

5.81.5% v7 (old)Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1Amazon: $218.49List Price: 299€181 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080395 PPIAMOLED

Table of Contents判决规格外壳和设备 - 玄武岩背板外壳通信和软件 - 4 年更新可持续性和操作 - 屏幕模式滑块摄像头 - 主摄像头性能良好,广角图像模糊不清显示屏 - 哑光面板作为亮点性能、排放和电池寿命 - 动力一般Notebookcheck 总体评分

4 Reviews ← exclude selected types

规格

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (NxtPaper Series)ProcessorMediatek Dimensity 6300 8 x 2 - 2.4 GHzGraphics adapterARM Mali-G57 MP2Memory8 GB Display6.80 inch 21:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, matte surface, glossy: no, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB , 500 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD up to 2GB, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometerNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B17/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B32/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B42), 5G (n1/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n20/​n26/​n28/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n48/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 167.6 x 75.5Battery5010 mAh Lithium-Ion, 33 Watt charging, reverse charging (wired)Chargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 108 MPix f/​1.75, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps Additional featuresSpeakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, eSIM support, fanlessWeight196 g

Price299 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications

外壳和设备 - 玄武岩背板外壳TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 的外壳为塑料框架。背面由熔岩中的玄武岩纤维或玻璃纤维制成,具体取决于颜色。并不是所有的颜色都能随处买到,这款智能手机最有可能的颜色是月光灰,就像我们的测试设备一样。这是一种偏蓝的灰色,无光泽,表面有大理石花纹。阿尔卑斯白与之相似,但颜色要浅得多。午夜蓝、淡金色和玫紫色是背面由玻璃纤维制成的色调,比较闪亮。

在稳定性方面,TCL 智能手机的表现相当一般:很容易扭动,液晶上也能看到压力,还能听到明显的吱吱声。做工方面,TCL 50 Pro NxtPlus 还算不错,材质过渡干净利落,几乎看不出来。

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 配备了 6.8 英寸大显示屏,边缘较窄,因此在同类产品中不算最轻,这一点可以原谅。不过,不到 200 克(约 7 盎司)的重量还是很容易握住的。

它拥有 512 GB 的大容量存储空间和 8 GB 内存,与同价位手机相比,内存容量相当可观。配备了用于无线支付的 NFC 功能。

虽然只有一个 nano-SIM 接口,但可以存储 eSIM 配置文件,因此也可以进行双 SIM 卡操作。在使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中,事实证明 microSD 端口的速度相对较慢。

» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名

尺寸比较

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper HMD Fusion CMF Phone 1 Motorola Moto G85 Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro DIN A6 ❌

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)

HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (Angelbird V60)

37.3 MB/s +60%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (Angelbird V60)

34.6 MB/s +48%Average of class Smartphone (5.72 - 58.9, n=62, last 2 years)

32.2 MB/s +38%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (Angelbird V60)

23.3 MB/s Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

22.1 MB/s -5%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)

19.14 MB/s -18%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.6 (20.9-38.6) HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38 (27-48.1) CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38.2 (30.2-49.5) Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.2 (28.8-46.3) TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø62.5 (39.5-71.7) HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø79.6 (28-89.4) CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø72.1 (33.5-83.5) Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø64.4 (40.3-78.4)

通信和软件 - 4 年更新TCL 手机提供的 WiFi 5 是最快的标准。接收数据时,数据传输速率相当稳定。而在发送数据时,则会反复出现掉线现象,多次重复测试时也很明显。总体而言,数据传输速率在预期范围内,但竞争对手的设备通常更快一些。

移动网络通信的最快标准是 5G。移动互联网的频率分集很好,这意味着 TCL 50 Pro 也可以在国外使用。不过,由于并非全球使用的所有频率都支持,因此如果您计划旅行,应提前告知自己。

我们还测试了手机在 4G 和 5G 网络中的接收情况。智能手机的信号质量不错。即使在困难的情况下,例如在狭窄的高楼之间,网络通常仍然可用。

使用的软件是基于Android 14 的 TCL UI。预装了一些第三方应用程序,包括用于广告目的的应用程序,但可以轻松删除。

TCL 承诺提供 2 个新的Android 版本和 4 年的安全更新。在这个价格范围内,这个承诺还算可以,但并不突出。

Networking

iperf3 transmit AXE11000Average of class Smartphone (49.8 - 1828, n=173, last 2 years)

729 MBit/s +161%CMF Phone 1802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax

404 (203min - 418max) MBit/s +45%Motorola Moto G85802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

361 (316min, 320.06P1 - 373max) MBit/s +29%Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

357 (59min - 385max) MBit/s +28%Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (10.5 - 718, n=215)

342 MBit/s +23%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

279 (114min, 123.57P1 - 329max) MBit/s HMD Fusion802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

255 (208min - 322max) MBit/s -9% iperf3 receive AXE11000Average of class Smartphone (52 - 1857, n=173, last 2 years)

749 MBit/s +117%Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

390 (366min - 387max) MBit/s +13%CMF Phone 1802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax

381 (362min - 387max) MBit/s +10%HMD Fusion802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

354 (331min - 374max) MBit/s +3%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

345 (331min, 331.87P1 - 356max) MBit/s Motorola Moto G85802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

341 (322min, 323.74P1 - 347max) MBit/s -1%Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (20.1 - 695, n=214)

329 MBit/s -5%

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper ; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø279 (114-329) TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper ; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø345 (331-356)

可持续性和操作 - 屏幕模式滑块在可持续发展方面,TCL 只是泛泛而谈,例如它已引入了环境影响管理系统,并正努力通过培训和个别措施最大限度地减少二氧化碳排放。我们无法在网上找到每件产品的二氧化碳平衡表或所用材料的相关信息。至少包装是无塑料的。

哑光涂层的触摸屏易于使用,边角部分也很灵敏。除了设备右侧的音量摇杆和待机键外,TCL 还安装了一个滑块,可用于改变显示屏的属性:您可以切换到黑白模式,由于对比度高,这种模式特别适合阅读文件;还可以切换到更节能的特殊模式,在这种模式下,剩余运行时间也会显示在启动屏幕上。

待机键上还集成了指纹传感器。可以存储多个手指指纹,一旦存储了一个指纹,传感器就能非常可靠地识别它,并在短暂等待后解锁手机。使用面部识别解锁也是可行的,但这是通过前置摄像头使用 2D 方法完成的,因此不太安全。

摄像头 - 主摄像头性能良好,广角图像模糊不清前置摄像头TCL 50 Pro 背面有三个镜头:1.08 亿像素的主摄像头、800 万像素的广角摄像头和 200 万像素的微距镜头。主摄像头通常只使用 1/9 的分辨率,即拍摄 1200 万像素的照片。不过,传感器的像素较大,可以捕捉到更多光线。如果需要,您也可以使用全部的 1.08 亿像素,但必须在设置中指定。

主摄像头拍摄的图像通常光线充足,细节丰富。我们也喜欢它的色彩。TCL 只能在细节清晰度方面做得更好一些。暗光和高对比度下的图像效果也不错。在实验室中,测试图的中央部分对比度较低,而边缘部分对比度较高。细节水平一般。在亮度仅为 1 勒克斯的情况下仍能识别主体,但细节显得非常粗糙。

视频最高可录制 1080p 和 30 fps。您必须在录制前确定镜头,录制过程中无法更换镜头。质量不错,自动对焦通常反应足够快。

不过,广角摄像头令人失望,只能拍摄出非常模糊的照片。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low LightWide Angle cameraclick to load imagesTCL 50 Pro NxtPaperApple iPhone 16 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesTCL 50 Pro NxtPaperApple iPhone 16 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesTCL 50 Pro NxtPaperApple iPhone 16 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesTCL 50 Pro NxtPaperApple iPhone 16 ProHonor Magic 6 ProCanon EOS 600D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x

8.2 ∆E8.6 ∆E12.5 ∆E7.1 ∆E10.5 ∆E7.3 ∆E7.4 ∆E9.5 ∆E9.3 ∆E3.7 ∆E8.5 ∆E5.1 ∆E5.5 ∆E8.6 ∆E9.4 ∆E3.9 ∆E7.7 ∆E10.4 ∆E5.4 ∆E3.9 ∆E6.3 ∆E3.7 ∆E4.7 ∆E8.6 ∆EColorChecker TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper : 7.33 ∆E min: 3.74 - max: 12.54 ∆E29.6 ∆E54 ∆E38.6 ∆E34.8 ∆E43.1 ∆E58 ∆E52.5 ∆E33.5 ∆E42.6 ∆E29.4 ∆E61.6 ∆E62.1 ∆E31.5 ∆E46.1 ∆E37.8 ∆E72.5 ∆E43.6 ∆E40.7 ∆E76.3 ∆E68.3 ∆E51 ∆E37 ∆E24.4 ∆E13.9 ∆EColorChecker TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper : 45.12 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 76.26 ∆E

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper

显示屏 - 哑光面板作为亮点TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 的屏幕实际上是一块标准的 IPS 面板,分辨率为 2,460 x 1,080 像素,帧频高达 120 Hz。如果你阅读制造商的产品描述,你可能会认为这是一款电子墨水显示屏,但这样的显示屏帧率太低,色彩太少,不适合日常使用。

不过,亚光涂层使观看体验与众不同:与许多其他智能手机不同,TCL 50 Pro 在明亮的环境中不会出现反光问题,而且色彩看起来非常鲜艳。500 cd/m² 左右的亮度值在这个价位的手机中只能算中等水平,但哑光涂层并不需要如此高的亮度来确保户外的良好可读性。

在我们的测试中,涂层也显得非常耐磨,几乎不会限制视角,这让人不禁要问,为什么更多的制造商不采用这种方案。

在 TCL 50 Pro 上测不到 PWM 闪烁,因此即使是敏感的人也会喜欢这款手机。

489cd/m²487cd/m²476cd/m²501cd/m²500cd/m²499cd/m²495cd/m²491cd/m²497cd/m²

Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 501 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 492.8 cd/m² Minimum: 7.5 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.95 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.241CCT: 6481 K

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8"HMD FusionIPS, 1612x720, 6.6"CMF Phone 1Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Motorola Moto G85P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Xiaomi Poco M6 ProAMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"Screen17%68%73%65%Brightness middle (cd/m²)500554 11%1169 134%1207 141%1016 103%Brightness (cd/m²)493533 8%1183 140%1177 139%1016 106%Brightness Distribution (%)9594 -1%97 2%94 -1%94 -1%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.50.27 46%Contrast (:1)10002052 105%Colorchecker dE 2000 *3.953.28 17%1.5 62%1.36 66%1.1 72%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *7.235.97 17%2.9 60%2.8 61%1.9 74%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.13.6 -71%1.9 10%1.4 33%1.3 38%Gamma2.241 98%2.145 103%2.22 99%2.23 99%2.28 96%CCT6481 100%7322 89%6733 97%6591 99%6420 101%* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8228 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度

CalMAN 色彩精度

卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB

CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White35.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.2 ms rise↘ 17.5 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey33.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 24 ms rise↘ 19.4 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.8 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 动力一般联发科 联发科 Dimensity 6300联发科 Dimensity 6300 是一款中端 SoC,在我们的基准测试中,它的性能在同价位产品中相当低。在处理器、系统和图形基准测试中,它在对比设备中仅处于中游位置。

上网速度相当快,但在滚动浏览大型网站时偶尔需要等待内容。UFS 2.2 闪存的速度在同价位产品中也是相当慢的。

在 41.7 °C(约 107 °F)的温度下,我们仅测出在长时间负载后机壳有适度升温。3DMark 压力测试也表明,性能几乎没有受到废热的影响。

TCL 50 Pro 提供立体声音效,听筒可用作第二个扬声器。最大音量尚可,但声音显得遥远,不够饱满。声音中也几乎没有低频。因此,最好使用 3.5 毫米音频接口或蓝牙连接耳机或扬声器。这样做没有任何问题,而且有多种编解码器可用于无线音频传输。

电池容量为 5,010 毫安时,因此比同类设备稍强。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,这款智能手机的续航时间达到了 15:29 小时。这意味着,在没有电源插座的情况下,一天的使用时间不会受到任何影响。通过随附的电源适配器,智能手机的最大充电功率为 33 瓦,需要约 2 小时才能充满电。

Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | Geekbench AI | 3DMark | GFXBench | Octane V2 Geekbench 6.5

Single-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (196 - 3785, n=202, last 2 years)

1691 Points +130%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

1027 Points +40%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

940 Points +28%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

922 Points +25%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (733 - 798, n=4)

764 Points +4%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

736 Points Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

730 Points -1% Multi-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=202, last 2 years)

4928 Points +158%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

2948 Points +54%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

2240 Points +17%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

2067 Points +8%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

1994 Points +4%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (1877 - 2129, n=4)

1970 Points +3%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1910 Points Geekbench 5.5

Single-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=135, last 2 years)

1197 Points +109%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

703 Points +23%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (572 - 582, n=2)

577 Points +1%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

572 Points Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

551 Points -4% Multi-CoreAverage of class Smartphone (550 - 8816, n=135, last 2 years)

4105 Points +151%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

1917 Points +17%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

1903 Points +16%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (1637 - 1712, n=2)

1675 Points +2%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1637 Points PCMark for Android - Work 3.0

Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 27169, n=185, last 2 years)

14499 Points +32%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

12367 Points +13%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

11724 Points +7%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (10990 - 12292, n=4)

11517 Points +5%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

10990 Points Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

10603 Points -4%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

8160 Points -26%Geekbench AI

Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years)

508 Points +190%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

196 Points +12%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

175 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (n=1)

175 Points 0% Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years)

1148 Points +556%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

196 Points +12%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

175 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (n=1)

175 Points 0% Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years)

1868 Points +378%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

471 Points +20%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

391 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (n=1)

391 Points 0%3DMark

Steel Nomad Light Unlimited ScoreAverage of class Smartphone (132 - 2838, n=119, last 2 years)

1278 Points +788%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

346 Points +140%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

144 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (131 - 152, n=3)

142.3 Points -1% Steel Nomad Light ScoreAverage of class Smartphone (132 - 2849, n=120, last 2 years)

1319 Points +810%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

344 Points +137%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

145 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (134 - 153, n=3)

144 Points -1% Wild Life Extreme UnlimitedAverage of class Smartphone (62 - 7212, n=187, last 2 years)

2802 Points +670%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

847 Points +133%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

410 Points +13%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

364 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (341 - 371, n=4)

358 Points -2%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

335 Points -8%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

163 Points -55% Wild Life ExtremeAverage of class Smartphone (61 - 7094, n=188, last 2 years)

2812 Points +646%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

850 Points +125%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

418 Points +11%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

377 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (336 - 381, n=4)

366 Points -3%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

345 Points -8%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

165 Points -56% Wild Life Unlimited ScoreAverage of class Smartphone (271 - 28053, n=186, last 2 years)

10607 Points +725%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

3130 Points +143%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

1578 Points +23%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (1216 - 1357, n=4)

1298 Points +1%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1286 Points Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

1221 Points -5%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

669 Points -48% Wild Life ScoreCMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

3123 Points +131%Average of class Smartphone (270 - 13896, n=95, last 2 years)

3078 Points +128%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

1575 Points +16%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

1352 Points Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (1221 - 1372, n=4)

1317 Points -3%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

1233 Points -9%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

675 Points -50%GFXBench

1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OffscreenAverage of class Smartphone (3.4 - 332, n=199, last 2 years)

112.4 fps +561%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

40 fps +135%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

23 fps +35%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

17 fps Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (15 - 17, n=4)

16 fps -6%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

14 fps -18%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

12 fps -29%on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier OnscreenAverage of class Smartphone (6.2 - 166, n=199, last 2 years)

59.5 fps +325%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

36 fps +157%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

21 fps +50%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

21 fps +50%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (9 - 30, n=4)

16.5 fps +18%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

14 fps Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

12 fps -14%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenAverage of class Smartphone (1.2 - 129, n=199, last 2 years)

43.7 fps +594%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

15 fps +138%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

8.6 fps +37%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

6.3 fps Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (5.8 - 6.3, n=4)

6.08 fps -3%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

5.4 fps -14%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

4 fps -37%on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier OnscreenAverage of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=200, last 2 years)

46.6 fps +407%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

22 fps +139%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

13 fps +41%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

13 fps +41%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (5.7 - 19, n=4)

10.8 fps +17%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

9.2 fps Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

8.3 fps -10%3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenAverage of class Smartphone (0.54 - 53, n=200, last 2 years)

20.4 fps +656%CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

6.5 fps +141%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

3.8 fps +41%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

2.7 fps Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (2.4 - 2.7, n=4)

2.58 fps -4%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

2.4 fps -11%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

1.7 fps -37%Octane V2 - Total Score

Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 119218, n=197, last 2 years)

47197 Points +89%Motorola Moto G85Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, Adreno 619, 12288

34162 Points +37%HMD FusionQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613, 8192

31097 Points +25%Average Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (24975 - 29211, n=4)

26652 Points +7%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mediatek Dimensity 6300, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192

24975 Points CMF Phone 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 8192

22739 Points -9%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288

22678 Points -9%

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper HMD FusionCMF Phone 1Motorola Moto G85Xiaomi Poco M6 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-525%49%1%42%49%165% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)528.8894.5 69%1024.12 94%529.8 0%973.53 84%1026 ?(529 - 1860, n=9) 94%2222 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) 320% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)498.7778 56%535.66 7%525.3 5%910.9 83%932 ?(499 - 1612, n=9) 87%1822 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=185, last 2 years) 265% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)227.7218.4 -4%294.28 29%220.7 -3%236.72 4%235 ?(100.2 - 337, n=9) 3%295 ?(47.6 - 504, n=185, last 2 years) 30% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)235.8189.4 -20%394.59 67%237 1%228.61 -3%264 ?(186.1 - 390, n=9) 12%340 ?(9.4 - 964, n=185, last 2 years) 44%

Max. LoadIdle

41.6 °C33.1 °C31.5 °C 41.4 °C37.2 °C31.5 °C 39.8 °C37.3 °C32 °C

Maximum: 41.6 °CAverage: 36.2 °C

33.1 °C34.2 °C38.6 °C33.1 °C35.5 °C41.7 °C33.2 °C35.5 °C40.9 °C

Maximum: 41.7 °CAverage: 36.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 41.9 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle

30.4 °C28.8 °C28.8 °C 30.4 °C29 °C29 °C 29.7 °C29.5 °C29.5 °C

Maximum: 30.4 °CAverage: 29.5 °C

29.4 °C29.5 °C29.6 °C29.3 °C29.5 °C30.5 °C29 °C30.1 °C30.1 °C

Maximum: 30.5 °CAverage: 29.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 37.4 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Stress Test

3DMark

Wild Life Stress Test StabilityHMD FusionAdreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

99.7 % 0%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.6 % 0%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.5 % Motorola Moto G85Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.4 % 0%CMF Phone 1Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.4 % 0% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestCMF Phone 1Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

99.6 % +1%Xiaomi Poco M6 ProMali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.3 % +1%Motorola Moto G85Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

99.1 % +1%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

98.6 % HMD FusionAdreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

98.1 % -1% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityCMF Phone 1Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash

98.9 % +1%TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash

98.3 %

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.25 (2.23-2.26) HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.989 (0.986-1.005) CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.11 (5.1-5.12) Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.5 (2.49-2.51) Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.06 (2.06-2.07) TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø8.12 (8.1-8.14) HMD Fusion Adreno 613, SD 4 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.04 (4.04-4.05) CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø18.6 (18.6-18.7) Motorola Moto G85 Adreno 619, SD 6s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø9.43 (9.4-9.46) Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.4 (7.39-7.42) Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.33 (7.32-7.33) TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø1.088 (1.077-1.095) CMF Phone 1 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 8.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 11.4% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 17% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.1 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.7% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.4% lower than median(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing

15h 29min

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 5010 mAhHMD Fusion5000 mAhCMF Phone 15000 mAhMotorola Moto G855000 mAhXiaomi Poco M6 Pro5000 mAhBattery Runtime-1%19%-4%-9%WiFi v1.3 (h)15.515.3 -1%18.4 19%14.9 -4%14.1 -9%Reader / Idle (h)32.9H.264 (h)18.6Load (h)4.8

Notebookcheck 总体评分TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper 的哑光显示屏效果非常好,具有多项优势。

不过,与同价位智能手机相比,该测试设备的性能略逊一筹。

Back to the verdict

TCL 50 Pro NxtPaper

- 01/03/2025 v8

Florian Schmitt

Chassis83%

Keyboard66 / 75 → 88%

Pointing Device94%

Connectivity42 / 69 → 61%

Weight89%

Battery90%

Display85%

Games Performance6 / 55 → 10%

Application Performance57 / 85 → 68%

AI Performance12%

Temperature88%

Noise100%

Audio65 / 90 → 72%

Camera64%

Average57%

73%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials10%Packaging90%Power Use50%Repairability22%Software Updates53.3% Total Sustainability Score: 37.6%

More articles related to this deviceTCL 50 Pro NxtPaper (NxtPaper Series)

TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 626404 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:

Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!